Securing External Data Connections
Requirements and security practices for establishing External Data Connections in the Game Warden platform.
Securing data exchange is essential for applications deploying in both Commercial, FedRAMP, and DOW Impact Level (IL) environments. Plan, document, and review every External Data Connection (EDC) to ensure compliance with DOW and FedRAMP security standards.
This guide outlines the requirements and security practices for establishing EDCs in the Game Warden platform.
Why securing EDCs matters
Improperly configured external connections can lead to data spills, unauthorized access, and Software Approval delays. For example:
- An IL4 application cannot send Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) to an IL2 system or public internet endpoint.
- Encrypt all data moving over external connections using FIPS-compliant standards.
- Game Warden must verify that connections don’t bypass IL or FedRAMP boundary segmentation rules.
Key security requirements
- Data Flow Documentation: Diagrams and written descriptions of all inbound, outbound, and bidirectional data flows.
- Encryption In Transit: Protect all data with TLS 1.2+ (for example, mTLS).
- Encryption At Rest: External systems must use FIPS 140-2 validated encryption modules or equal.
- Impact Level Segmentation: Data must remain within its assigned Impact Level or FedRAMP baseline unless explicitly approved by the risk-owning Authorizing Official (AO).
Security guidelines for Impact Levels
| Impact Level | Requirement |
|---|---|
| IL2 – Public or Non-Critical Mission Data |
|
| IL4 – Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) |
|
| IL5 – Higher Sensitivity CUI / Mission-Critical |
|
| IL6 – Classified Systems |
|
Security guidelines for FedRAMP Certification Classes (Class B – Class D)
The following table outlines the specific security and boundary requirements for all FedRAMP certification classes.
| Certification Class | Security & Boundary Requirements |
|---|---|
| FedRAMP Low / Class B |
|
| FedRAMP Class C (Moderate) |
|
| FedRAMP Class D (High) |
|
EDC and Sponsoring Agency Approval
Second Front customers may use a sponsoring authorizing agency to support capabilities that extend beyond the Game Warden authorization boundary. These EDCs can integrate external services and data sources, provided the connections receive the required approvals and meet applicable security requirements.
The requirements for external connections differ between FedRAMP and DOW deployments. Each area below lists the requirement for both.
- FedRAMP: The sponsoring agency's AO must accept the risk associated with an expanded authorization boundary or EDC. The AO must approve the connection through a Security Impact Analysis (SIA) memorandum or other required authorization process.
- DOW: The AO or Authorizing Official Designated Representative (AODR) retains authority over external connections entering or leaving the designated Impact Level boundary.
- FedRAMP: The sponsoring agency's AO must accept the risk associated with an expanded authorization boundary or EDC. The AO must approve the connection through a Security Impact Analysis (SIA) memorandum or other required authorization process.
- DOW: The AO or Authorizing Official Designated Representative (AODR) retains authority over external connections entering or leaving the designated Impact Level boundary.
- FedRAMP: Direct system-to-system connections with external or non-authorized boundaries may require an Interconnection Security Agreement (ISA), Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), or other applicable interconnection documentation.
- DOW: External connections may require Mission Owner attestations and additional connection approvals to maintain appropriate segmentation of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and Controlled Technical Information (CTI).
- FedRAMP: Document each EDC in updated Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and Authorization Boundary Diagrams (ABDs). The documentation should identify the connection's ingress and egress paths, ports, protocols, and applicable encryption controls.
- DOW: Document each ATC or EDC in updated DFDs and ABDs. The documentation should identify the connection's ingress and egress paths, ports, protocols, and applicable encryption controls.
- FedRAMP: You may connect to non-FedRAMP external endpoints, such as operational webhooks or logging services, once you properly document them and secure approval. The connection must use the required encryption controls and must not expose CUI or PII to an unauthorized external system.
- DOW: External commercial connections are subject to additional restrictions across Impact Levels IL2 through IL5. Outbound connections may require explicit approval from the Mission Owner or AO.
Commercial connection rules
Commercial data connections entering a DOW-IL environment must follow a strict ingress-only policy. This requirement also applies to IL2 environments. Do not allow outbound or bidirectional communication unless the ATC or EDC request process explicitly approves it.
Follow these security requirements and manage connection risks proactively to maintain secure data flows, protect critical systems, and support mission continuity. Maintain a documented incident response plan so your team can respond to potential security events.
ATC or EDC checklist
If your application includes any EDCs, you must submit an EDC request package to Second Front for review and approval. Use the checklist below to validate your setup before assembling the required artifacts for your submission.
Applies to all ATCs or EDCs.
- Data protection: Is data encrypted in transit using TLS 1.2+ or mTLS and at rest using active FIPS 140-2 or FIPS 140-3 validated cryptographic modules?
- Connection documentation: Have you submitted updated Network Diagrams, DFDs, and ABDs that show the exact ingress and egress routes, protocols, and ports?
- SIEM log forwarding: Are connection lifecycle events, connection failures, and volume metrics streamed immutably to the Game Warden SIEM follow the NIST AU-02 and AU-06?
Applies to all ATCs or EDCs.
- Data protection: Is data encrypted in transit using TLS 1.2+ or mTLS and at rest using active FIPS 140-2 or FIPS 140-3 validated cryptographic modules?
- Connection documentation: Have you submitted updated Network Diagrams, DFDs, and ABDs that show the exact ingress and egress routes, protocols, and ports?
- SIEM log forwarding: Are connection lifecycle events, connection failures, and volume metrics streamed immutably to the Game Warden SIEM follow the NIST AU-02 and AU-06?
Applies to IL 2–6.
- Impact Level segmentation: Are data flows confined to their assigned IL without bypassing segmentation controls?
- Ingress-only compliance: Does the commercial-to-DOW connection enforce an ingress-only data flow unless the AO has granted an explicit outbound exception?
- CTI and CUI containment: Have you verified that your application does not send Controlled Technical Information (CTI) or National Security System (NSS) Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) outside the DOW environment?
- DOW governance: Have you obtained a signed and executed Mission Owner Attestation for IL4 and IL5 interconnections?
Applies to Classes B–D.
- FedRAMP baseline alignment: Is the destination external service FedRAMP-authorized at an equivalent or higher impact baseline?
- Non-FedRAMP endpoints: If connecting to an unauthorized external service, such as an operational webhook, is the connection declared in the SSP or Application Security Profile, restricted to non-sensitive telemetry, and confirmed to carry no CUI or PII?
- NIST CA-03 compliance: Is a formal Interconnection Security Agreement (ISA) or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) documented for system-to-system data exchanges?
- Egress deny-by-default: Is outbound traffic blocked by default at the mesh or firewall level, with only explicitly approved IP addresses, ports, and domains allowed?
ATC memorandum
For DOW Impact Level 2, 4, and 5 applications, the ATC memorandum replaces the previous EDC form for new connections. Complete one ATC memorandum for each connection and include it in your request package.
!!! note "ATC scope" The ATC approval applies only to the Game Warden platform as a Service configuration under the DIU Information System Security Manager (ISSM) and Authorizing Official (AO). It does not authorize connections to or from any other government information system boundary.
Some existing connections retain their grandfathered status and may continue under the EDC form. Your Mission Success Manager (MSM) can confirm which process applies to your connection.
The ATC memorandum documents the proposed connection and serves as the ISSM's recommendation to the DIU AO. Include the following information:
- System identification: Identify the owning organization, eMASS system ID, and Impact Level for the source and destination systems.
- Connection details: Specify the source and destination IP addresses or URLs, traffic direction, data elements transmitted in each direction, explicit exclusions, port, and whether the connection is permanent or temporary.
- Technical interface: Specify the file types or payload format, interface type, encryption, and authentication method.
- Risk assessment: Identify the impacted controls and describe how you validated the connection risk and the sensitivity classification of the transmitted data.
→ Download ATC memorandum template
Contact your MSM if you need help completing the memorandum.
Required artifacts
Include these four artifacts with your EDC submission package to Second Front for review:
- Complete inventory of all external IP addresses, ports, protocols, and communication directions, including ingress, egress, and bidirectional connections.
- Detailed description of the data transmitted through each connection and its categorization, such as CUI, CTI, or non-sensitive operational telemetry.
- Clear operational justification and business purpose for each connection.
- Complete inventory of all external IP addresses, ports, protocols, and communication directions, including ingress, egress, and bidirectional connections.
- Detailed description of the data transmitted through each connection and its categorization, such as CUI, CTI, or non-sensitive operational telemetry.
- Clear operational justification and business purpose for each connection.
- Updated DFDs and ABDs that show exact ingress and egress routes, security mesh boundaries, and encryption mechanisms.
- Format the diagrams consistently with your existing Body of Evidence.
- Completed Interconnection Security Agreement (ISA) or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), as required under NIST CA-03.
- Updated Table 7, Table 9, and Appendix Q declarations in your System Security Plan (SSP) or Application Security Profile.
- Completed ATC memorandum for each connection, or the EDC form for grandfathered connections. Refer to Authorization to Connect (ATC) memorandum.
- Signed Mission Owner Attestation.
- Security review sign-off confirming IL segmentation and CUI and CTI containment.
Need help
For questions or to submit your request package, contact your Mission Success Manager.