Onboarding Process for FedRAMP Deployment
Implementation phases, shared responsibilities, required artifacts, and technical considerations for receiving FedRAMP Certification
This guide outlines the implementation process and shared responsibilities between your team and the 2F platform. It covers each onboarding phase, the required artifacts, and how the team will work together to securely deploy your application and receive FedRAMP Certification.
Implementation phases & milestones
| Phase | What Second Front Does | What You Do |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-engagement Alignment |
|
|
| Kickoff |
|
|
| Configuration |
|
|
| Gap Assessment & Documentation Development |
| Participate in control gap analysis and remediation planning. Develop required FedRAMP documentation, including:
|
| Security Review |
|
|
| Approve |
| No action required. |
| Deploy to Production |
|
|
| Third-Party Assessment (3PAO) |
|
Important: Customers are responsible for performing SAST and providing the results to the 3PAO. |
| Authorization |
|
|
| Day 2 Operations – Continuous Monitoring (ConMon) |
|
|
Shared Responsibility Model
Second Front uses the Shared Responsibility Model to define customer-owned and Second Front-managed responsibilities, streamlining implementation and compliance. Refer to Game Warden's Shared Responsibility Model for more information.
Required technical artifacts
To support a smooth and secure implementation, collect, review, and submit the required items. listed in the Technical Artifacts guide before you begin the onboarding process.
Security requirements
Security is core to the 2F platform. Prepare the following:
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Authorization Boundary Diagram | Visual representation of your system's FedRAMP boundary, showing what falls within the authorization scope and how external systems integrate. |
| CVEs & Remediation | You'll use Findings to manage container scans. Address CVEs per the Acceptance Baseline Criteria. |
| SSP | Complete FedRAMP authorization package containing all security documentation, control implementations, test results, and supporting evidence required for ATO. |
| Control Implementations | Detailed documentation demonstrating how your system implements each required NIST SP 800-53 security control with evidence of compliance. |
| SAST Scan & AI Attestation | Prepare static analysis outputs and AI-related disclosures, if applicable. |
Technical considerations
-
Access Control: Identity federation, least privilege, and strong authentication
-
Logging & Monitoring: Centralized logging, audit trails, and monitoring
-
Pipelines & Image Push: Secure CI/CD pipelines, signed images, and controlled promotion
-
Configuration Management: Change control and configuration baselines
Action items & best practices
- Secure a Federal Agency Sponsor
- Assign clear compliance ownership
- Start system security control planning and BoE development
- Resolve vulnerabilities in the process
- Align application architecture with FedRAMP authorization boundaries
- Treat the 3PAO assessment as a formal audit
- Establish ConMon workflows before authorization